Omni-Genocide

Last week we picked back up on the concept of Equality of Being after a panel set up by the mayor of New York recommended the elimination of gifted schools and programs. The concept was first predicted by watching how the definition of equality has changed throughout the country's history. Originally, it was a refutation of the King's divine right to rule. Then it become equality under the law, followed by equality of opportunity. Today we live under the big push for equality of outcome, which the left calls equity. So, even if you work twice as hard, or are twice as talented, you should be paid the same as the rest. It is common today for people to claim the a disparity of outcomes is proof of racism, sexism, or some other form of prejudice.

The final step of equality would then be equality of being. It's not enough that the man who's twice as smart gets paid the same as everyone else; he must be compelled to act at a low intelligence level to protect the feelings of the less gifted. That is the point of the New York panel's conclusions. Much of that is about race. It's hurtful to blacks and Latinos to see that the gifted students are mostly white and Asian, thus whites and Asians should be academically stunted. The policy won't have the intended effect. Evidence shows that policy will backfire and racial disparity will actually increase. But even if it didn't, even if scoring is doctored and curved so that all races come out even, everyone will still know who is smarter and what the patterns are, and all the policies to favor the low performers will only increase resentments on both sides.

This is why the left promote racial mixing at every opportunity. If there are no races, there can be no racial disparity. Many on the right are concerned with white genocide, of which there is plenty of evidence. We note that racial mixing seems to only be encouraged for white countries. But, at the end of the day, it's part of a more general antipathy to race. They are loudest now against white because of the tremendous success of western civilization, but ultimately they will seek omni-genocide; the destruction of all races by intermixing.

The same concept applies to gender. Consider this recent news story, where students are being taught the existence of over 100 genders. Conservatives call it absurd, a joke, but the whole point is to make it a joke. Mockery is the goal. If they can make gender and absurd concept, then it has no meaning. If they can trick the boys into acting like girls and the girls like boys, then - they hope - they can erase gender disparity as well. Again, it's likely to backfire, based on evidence. Sweden is the most feminist country on Earth, yet has high gender disparity in occupational choice. That is, the women tend to choose stereotypically female jobs, like nursing. It's a bit amusing that the Swedes will so enthusiastically agree with all the modern nonsense in conservation, yet go on living mostly normal lives anyway. (Unfortunately for them, that little cognitive bubble will have to be popped by reality eventually.)

In most aspects, we promote a philosophy that is pro-life, whereas the left is more like a death cult. We support omni-nationalism, the notion the nations have a right to their culture, language, self-determination, and borders. In the big picture, we are advocates of diversity. The left believe everyone should be genetically, culturally, and ideologically the same, and set on the impossible task of trying to force sterile uniformity on nature. They will fail, of course, and even if they did succeed in coercing uniformity on everyone they would still fail to eliminate disparity, because we are not the Borg. We are humans with souls, and their attempts to impose lifeless materialism on the global collective body of humanity will ultimately be rejected by the host.