Friday, July 5, 2019

How do you feel about your verdict?

The words of this title - How do you feel about your verdict? - are enough to get you imprisoned in the tyrannical nation of Great Britain. According to Ezra Levant of Rebel Media, the utterance of those words to convicted Pakistani child gang rapists outside of a courthouse was one of three reasons given for Tommy Robinson's re-conviction today of "breaching the peace" and of contempt of court for violating a "reporting restriction." In England there is no freedom of the press; all facts must come via sources approved by Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service. [As of yet, there has been no statement of condemnation against the outlandish ruling issued from Elizabeth II - the worst monarch of all history - nor will there be one.] In true irony, Robinson faced much more intrusive haranguing from BBC and other approved journalists outside the courthouse of his own hearings.

It has been reported that the court heard from a former police officer that the British government had effectively banned all investigations into Pakistani rape gangs, informing police stations that the girls were fully aware of the sexual reality of the world they were entering. It can't be repeated enough: in England, foreigners who operate child prostitution rings are permitted to operate, while citizen activists who cover a rare instance of actual prosecution for the crimes are imprisoned.

There are several reasons the government might behave this way, none of which are mutually exclusive. Most obvious, the government is trying to save face. They don't want the reality, that the British government has eagerly imported the foreigners who are now turning British children into sex slaves, getting too much publicity. In a sense, Robinson really is breaching the peace, because there is a fear that if the British people really knew what was going on in their country, they would revolt against the government. That fear is largely unfounded, though. Where are the riots now that it was revealed the government was actively suppressing investigation of child rapists? There are none, and anyone with a rational mind suspected that was happening already. The British people are not going to revolt; they will meekly accept their fate as a captive nation. I suspect that the British government is not only wasting its time by prosecuting Robinson's unauthorized journalism, because nothing will happen anyway, but they risk making him a martyr for the increasingly disenchanted populace to rally around. That is, they are more likely to bring about the result they fear most (popular revolt) by making a big public spectacle of their miscarriage of justice than they would if they just let Tommy continue reporting to the small portion of the British population who will listen. They are, it seems, attempting to rule by fear, discouraging any future rogue reporters from piping up.

A second reason for the government to be more concerned with guerrilla journalism than the organized sexual exploitation of minors is that the upper branches of British government have a history of pedophilia scandals going back to the 1960s. It may simply be that the old cliche of "foreigners are doing the jobs that the whites won't" is proven true again. The Paki gangs supply children to the perverts in Parliament, and are granted semi-official immunity in return.

The reasons grow even more grim from there. It may simply be a milestone of the transition of England from a free, Christian nation to one enslaved by Sharia Law. And it may be that the government of Great Britain hates its own people and works singularly towards the goal of seeing the citizenry enslaved. Call it a wild-eyed theory, but there is really no evidence to counter it, only evidence to confirm it, such as what was seen today.

No comments:

Post a Comment