Saturday, November 2, 2019

Pete Buttigieg Has Surged

In Social Gospel Movement I predicted Buttigieg would win the nomination because liberals would find the open mockery to Christianity of a "gay Christian" president to be too irresistible to pass up. In Who's Surprised I stated that his preferred status means that he can (ironically) play the role of the straight man, and not have to engage in the same level of lefty virtue signaling and racial self-flagellation as the likes of Warren and O'Rourke.

The New York Times reports that "Pete Buttigieg has surged" in Iowa, now one point ahead of the one-time frontrunner Biden, one behind Bernie Sanders, and a few behind the new frontrunner Liz Warren. From the Conservative Treehouse article, Limo-Left Turn to Buttigieg to Save Them…
The clock is ticking faster now.  Beto crashed miserably; Kamala’s giggling high-school schtick is embarrassing herself and others; the DNC has run out of handlers for Biden’s frequent episodes; Bernie is still yelling at trees; and now Warren has outed her plan to tax everyone into oblivion to fund her $52 trillion, yes TRILLION, healthcare scheme. [...] Buttigieg is now their latest hope.
Biden is falling from presumptive-nominee status for three major reasons.
  1. His gaffe-prone senility
  2. The decision of House Democrats to push forward on impeachment(ish) proceedings opens Biden up to serious exposure regarding Ukraine, and shows that Democrats are more than willing to sacrifice him on the altar of Getting Trump.
  3. Obama has still not endorsed his former VP.
O'Rourke fizzled out because his support was never authentic and he became the walking caricature of a libtarded dunce. (The libtarded part may or may not have been an act, but the dunce aspect seemed very credible.) As Sundance points out, Warren's recent healthcare plan proposal is likely to douse cold water on her campaign in places like Iowa and New Hampshire, and comes about because straight-married white Democrats have to go over-the-top to appease the SJW/AOC wings of the party (especially those who built their careers off abusing affirmative action policies.) The New York Times did not mention her healthcare plan, but did include a snippet on why Iowa voters like her.
Jonathan Morrison, 45, of Mason City, said he was drawn to Ms. Warren because of her grasp of economic issues and believed she would “hold her own” against the president.
Yikes. Not only has she been pushed into psychotic anti-Trump Twitter rants, she's now destroyed any notion of her "grasp of economic issues." The best she can hope for is that enough Democrat voters will remain misinformed for the next few months. (A reasonable gamble.)

Overall, I'm pleased with my prediction about Buttigieg, which was made when he was only polling at around three percent. He's now neck-and-neck with heavyweights Sanders and Biden. His weakness has always been electability, since Latinos and Blacks aren't going to turn out for a homosexual. But, Biden is the only candidate that really polls well with blacks. With him falling, Buttigieg's handicap will become less of an issue.

Predictions aside, I somewhat hope Warren wins the nomination. For one, at least she is a mother, and we should not fall into the European model of electing the childless to office. Considering that her primary opposition consists of a sell-out Bolshevik, a homosexual with no résumé, and a geriatric demon with baggage... well she's not the worst that the Democrats could offer. Second, her nomination will help us to educate whites that it is okay to take personal gain by abusing affirmative action - which is nothing more than state-sanctioned open racism against whites. Lie on your applications. Say you have high cheekbones. It will be okay.

No comments:

Post a Comment